Brain Radiotherapy With Pyrotinib and Capecitabine in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: A Nonrandomized Phase 2 Trial.

Importance: The potential benefit of combining intracranial effective systemic therapy with radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases remains unclear. Objective: To assess the activity and safety of combining radiotherapy with pyrotinib and capecitabine in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial with a safety run-in phase. Between January 2020 and August 2022, patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases were enrolled. The data cutoff date was February 1, 2023. Interventions: Patients received either fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy or whole-brain radiotherapy. Treatment with pyrotinib (400 mg, once daily) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily, on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) was initiated from the first day of radiotherapy to the seventh day after the completion of radiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was 1-year central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included CNS objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, and changes in neurocognitive function. Results: A total of 40 female patients (median age, 50.5 years [IQR, 46-59 years]) were enrolled and received treatment, including 3 patients in safety run-in phase. With a median follow-up of 17.3 months (IQR, 10.3-26.9), the 1-year CNS PFS rate was 74.9% (95% CI, 61.9%-90.7%), and the median CNS PFS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 15.5 to not reached). The 1-year PFS rate was 66.9% (95% CI, 53.1%-84.2%), and the median PFS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 12.8-34.1). The CNS objective response rate was 85% (34 of 40). Median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (7.5%). Asymptomatic radiation necrosis was identified in 4 of 67 lesions (6.0%) treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Most patients maintained neurocognitive function, as evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination at different points. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this trial suggest that radiotherapy combined with pyrotinib and capecitabine is associated with long intracranial survival benefit in patients with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer and brain metastases with an acceptable safety profile. This combination deserves further validation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04582968.

Adjuvant medial versus entire supraclavicular lymph node irradiation in high-risk early breast cancer (SUCLANODE): a protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Supraclavicular nodal (SCL) irradiation is commonly used for patients with high-risk breast cancer after breast surgery. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) breast contouring atlases delineate the medial part of the SCL region, while excluding the posterolateral part. However, recent studies have found that a substantial proportion of SCL failures are located in the posterolateral SCL region, outside of the RTOG/ESTRO-defined SCL target volumes. Consequently, many radiation oncologists advocate for enlarging the SCL irradiation target volume to include both the medial and posterolateral SCL regions. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether adding the posterolateral SCL irradiation improves survival outcomes for high-risk breast cancer patients. METHODS: The SUCLANODE trial is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and adverse events of medial SCL irradiation (M-SCLI group) and medial plus posterolateral SCL irradiation (entire SCL irradiation, E-SCLI group) in high-risk breast cancer patients who underwent breast conserving-surgery or mastectomy. Patients with pathological N2-3b disease following initial surgery, or clinical stage III or pathological N1-3b if receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy, are eligible and randomly assigned (1:1) to M-SCLI group and E-SCLI group. Stratification is by chemotherapy sequence (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant), T stage (T3-4 vs. T1-2), N stage (N1-2 vs. N3), and ER status (positive vs. negative). Other radiation volumes are identical in the two arms, including breast/chest wall, undissected axillary lymph node, and internal mammary node. Advanced intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or tomotherapy techniques are recommended. Both hypofractionated and conventional fractionation schedules are permitted. The primary end point is invasive disease-free survival, and secondary end points included overall survival, SCL recurrence, local-regional recurrence, distance recurrence, safety outcome, and patient-reported outcomes. The target sample size is 1650 participants. DISCUSSION: The results of the SUCLANODE trial will provide high-level evidence regarding whether adding posterolateral SCL irradiation to medial SCL target volume provides survival benefit in patients with high-risk breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05059379. Registered 28 September 2021, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05059379 .

Favorable prognosis of breast cancer brain metastases patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are highly heterogenous with widely differing survival. The prognosis of the oligometastatic breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM) has not been well studied. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of BCBM patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions. METHODS: Four hundred and forty-five BCBM patients treated between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2018 at our institute were included. Clinical characteristics and treatment information were obtained from patient's medical records. The updated breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA) was calculated. RESULTS: The median OS after diagnosis of BM were 15.9 months. Median OS for patients with GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2, 2.5-3 and 3.5-4 were 6.9, 14.2, 21.8, 42.6 months respectively. The total number of intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions, in addition to the Breast GPA, salvage local therapy and systemic therapy (anti-HER2 therapy, chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) were demonstrated to be associated with prognosis. One hundred and thirteen patients (25.4%) had 1-5 total metastatic lesions at BM diagnosis. Patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions had a significantly longer median OS of 24.3 months compared to those with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions with a median OS of 12.2 months (P < 0.001; multivariate HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.43-0.72). Among the patients with 1-5 metastatic lesions, median OS for GPA 0-1.0 was 9.8 months, compared to 22.8, 28.8 and 71.0 for GPA 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0 respectively, which is much longer than the corresponding patients with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions, with medium OS of 6.8, 11.6, 18.6 and 42.6 months respectively for GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions demonstrated better OS. The prognostic value of the Breast GPA and the survival benefit of salvage local therapy and continuation of systemic therapy after BM were confirmed.

A retrospective study of adjuvant proton radiotherapy for breast cancer after lumpectomy: a comparison of conventional-dose and hypofractionated dose.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the adverse reactions of conventional-dose and hypofractionated dose of proton therapy for breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients treated with proton radiotherapy in conventional-dose or hypofractionated dose were studied retrospectively. RESULT: From January 2017 to December 2019, our center treated 50 patients following lumpectomy with proton radiotherapy. According to the AJCC 8th Edition standard, there were stage I in 26 patients, stage II in 22 patients, and stage III in 2 patients. A total of 14 patients received intensity-modulated proton therapy at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, followed by a 10 Gy 4 fractionated boost to the lumpectomy cavity, while 36 received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) 48 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity. Median follow-up time for 40.05 Gy group was 35.6 months (15-43 months). Median follow-up time for 50 Gy group was 46.8 months (36-68 months). For acute toxicity, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis in conventional-dose group were 35.7% and 57.1%, respectively. In hypofractionated dose group, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis were 91.7% and 8.3%, respectively. The radiodermatitis is hypofractionneted dose better than conventional-dose significantly. Grade 1 radiation-induced esophagitis in conventional-dose group and hypofractionated dose group were 85.71% and 60%, respectively. For late toxicity, no patients developed radiation-induced pneumonitis and rib fracture in conventional-dose group. Three patients presented grade 1 pneumonitis; one patient presented graded 2 pneumonitides and two patients presented rib fracture in hypofractionated dose group. One presented hypothyroidism in hypofractionated dose group. All patients were satisfied with breast shape. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for conventional-dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 92.9%, respectively. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for hypofractionated dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Proton radiation therapy can significantly reduce the normal tissue dose in breast cancer patients' hearts, lungs, and other organs. Hypofractionated proton therapy shortens the treatment course with mild radiation-related adverse effects, and has a better effect on addressing the acute adverse reactions than conventional proton radiotherapy.

The Role of Radiotherapy for Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced Breast Cancer following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Background: For locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients who remained unresectable after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), radiotherapy (RT) is considered as an approach for tumor downstaging. In this study, we attempted to discuss the value of RT for patients with unresectable or progressive disease in the breast and/or regional nodes following NST. Methods: Between January 2013 and November 2020, the data for 71 patients with chemo-refractory LABC or de novo bone-only metastasis stage IV BC who received locoregional RT with or without surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Factors associated with tumor complete response (CR) were recognized using logistic regression. Locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was applied to recognize the recurrence risk factors. Results: After RT, 11 patients (15.5%) achieved total cCR. Triple-negative subtype (TNBC) was associated with a lower total cCR rate compared with other subtypes (p = 0.033). 26 patients proceeded to surgery, and the operability rate was 36.6%. 1-year LRPFS and PFS were 79.0% and 58.0%, respectively, for the entire cohort. Surgical cases had an improved 1-year LRPFS (p = 0.015), but not 1-year PFS (p = 0.057), compared with definitive RT cases. Non-any cCR was the most prominent predictor of a shorter LRPFS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.002) in the multivariate analysis. Higher TNM stage showed a trend toward a shorter LRPFS time (p = 0.058), and TNBC (p = 0.061) showed a trend toward a shorter PFS interval. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that RT was an effective tumor downstaging option for chemo-refractory LABC. For patients with favorable tumor regression, surgery following RT might bring survival benefits.

Entire Versus Medial Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation for Patients With High-Risk Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to examine whether elective inclusion of the posterolateral supraclavicular node (SCL) region to the standard medial SCL target volume improves SCL control and survival outcomes in patients with high-risk node-positive breast cancer undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 544 consecutive women with high-risk breast cancer treated with postoperative chest wall/breast and RNI in our center from January 2015 to December 2016. High-risk features were defined as clinical or pathologic stage N2-3b disease. Patients were classified into the medial SCL irradiation (M-SCLI) group and the entire SCL irradiation (E-SCLI) group, which included both the medial and the posterolateral SCL region. SCL recurrence (SCLR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared. Propensity-score matching (PSM) and multivariate cox regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 64.2 months. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of SCLR between the 2 groups, with 5-year rates of 2.0% in the M-SCLI group and 0.6% in the E-SCLI group (P = .1). After PSM, there was also no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of SCLR (2.1% vs 0.5%; P = .2). Only 2 patients had recurrence in the posterolateral SCL region, with 1 patient in each group. Similarly, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between the M-SCLI and E-SCLI group both before PSM (5-year rates of 78.5% vs 78.8%, P = .8; 92.2% vs 90.0%, P = .2) and after PSM (76.7% vs 77.2%, P = .8; 91.5% vs 88.4%, P = .1). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that E-SCLI was not independently prognostic for DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: E-SCLI does not appear to be associated with improved SCL control and survival outcomes in high-risk node-positive breast cancer. These data do not support the routine use of E-SCLI in N2-3b disease. We initiated a multicenter randomized controlled phase 3 study comparing M-SCLI and E-SCLI to further validate these results.

Molecular subtypes predict second breast events of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery.

PURPOSE: Currently, the prognostic value of molecular subtypes in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains unclear. In this study, we explored whether molecular subtypes could predict second breast events (SBEs) in patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2016, 291 DCIS patients treated with BCS were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into four molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The SBE incidence was calculated by the competing risk model and compared by Gray's test. The disease-free survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 66 months, 12 SBEs were identified. The 5-year overall SBE incidence of luminal A, luminal B, HER2 overexpression, and TNBC was 2.18%, 4.25%, 15.15%, and 0.00%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the HER2 overexpression subtype was the predictor of overall (p = 0.005), in situ (p = 0.004), and ipsilateral SBEs (p = 0.008). Patients with endocrine therapy were less likely to develop in situ SBEs (p = 0.039). Additionally, patients with closed (<2 mm) or involved margins were related to a higher risk of contralateral SBEs (p = 0.029). In the multivariate analysis, the HER2 overexpression subtype remained of prognostic values for overall (p = 0.006), in situ (p = 0.029), and ipsilateral SBEs (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The molecular subtype, especially the HER2 overexpression subtype, was the independent prognostic factor for DCIS patients who underwent BCS.

Symptoms Related to Brachial Plexus Neuropathy After Supraclavicular Irradiation and Boost in Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of symptoms related to brachial plexus neuropathy (BPN) and the dose distribution to the brachial plexus (BP) in patients with breast cancertreated with supraclavicular (SCV) irradiation and boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, 117 patients with initial ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node (SLN) metastasis and 39 with recurrent SLN metastasis between 2008 and 2018 in our cancer center were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with 50 Gy of SCV irradiation in 25 fractions and a boost (median dose, 10 Gy; range, 10-16 Gy) to involved nodes in the SCV area. Symptoms related to BPN (including ipsilateral arm numbness, pain, and weakness) were recorded and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The BP was delineated on simulation computed tomography, and the dose distributions to the BP were evaluated. Meanwhile, 297 patients treated with SCV irradiation without boost during the same period were identified as a control group to compare the incidences of BPN-related symptoms and dosimetric data with patients who received an SCV boost. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate was 80.3% for patients with initial SLN metastasis and 51.0% for patients with recurrent SLN metastasis. For patients who received an SCV boost, incidence rates of ipsilateral arm numbness, pain, and weakness were 23.9%, 18.3%, and 34.3%, respectively. Four patients (5.6%) developed grade 2 numbness and 3 (4.3%) developed grade 2 arm weakness. In the control group, incidence rates of arm numbness, pain, and weakness were 31.6%, 21.9%, and 36.0%, respectively. The incidence of BPN-related symptoms was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Symptoms of grade 3 were not observed in either cohort. The mean doses to the BP in patients who received boost and who did not were 56.8 and 46.8 Gy, respectively (P < .001). The maximum doses to the BP in patients who received boost and who did not were 64.5 and 53.5 Gy, respectively (P < .001). The BP volumes receiving at least 50 Gy, 60 Gy, 61 Gy, and 62 Gy were also significantly higher in the boosted group compared with the control group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that an SCV boost of 10 Gy did not increase the incidence of BPN-related symptoms and that the toxicity to the BP was acceptable. Comprehensive treatment including SCV irradiation and boost led to satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer who had SLN metastasis.

Prognostic value of metabolic signature on 18F-FDGuptake in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a major modality of postoperative treatment in breast cancer. The maximal standardized value (SUVmax) is 18FDG-PET/CT derived parameter that reported to be a valuable prognostic factor in cancer patients. Herein, we aimed to identify a prognostic gene signature associated with glucose uptake for breast cancer patients after RT by leveraging the mRNA expression profiling on public datasets. The glucose uptake signature was constructed using the single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm and evaluated in GSE21217 where SUVmax value was measured by PET-CT directly. The prognostic value was validated in three post-RT breast cancer cohorts (GSE103744, NKI, and FUSCC databases). The patients were stratified into glucose uptake signature score-high and low groups. Patients with a higher score had worse survival than those with a lower score. Mechanistically, the glucose uptake signature was calculated in each cell type of a single-cell RNA-seq database from five breast cancer patients. Glucose uptake signature score was significantly elevated in the malignant epithelial cells compared with normal ones. The immunosuppression markers including PDCD1, TIGIT, LAG3, and HAVCR2 were significantly upregulated in the T cells bearing a high glucose uptake signature score. Collectively, our results demonstrated the potential prognostic value of a glucose uptake signature in the post-RT breast cancer patients.

Delayed initiation of radiation therapy is associated with inferior outcomes for breast cancer patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors after breast-conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the interval between adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) completion and postoperative radiation therapy initiation (ICR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) affects ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) or survival. METHODS: All women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and underwent BCS between 2005 and 2014 were included. In total, 1,472 patients underwent adjuvant CT followed by postoperative radiation therapy (RT) (CT+), whereas 402 patients received postoperative RT alone (CT-). Analyses were stratified by ICR and the interval between surgery and the initiation of postoperative RT (ISR) in these two cohorts. The cutoff points for treatment delay were 47 days in the CT+ cohort and 69 days in the CT- cohort. IBTR, local-regional failure (LRF), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed through Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors of survival outcomes. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 56 months. There was an association between a delay in ICR and an increase in IBTR in the CT+ group (P=0.014 for intervals ≤47 vs. >47 days). This association was confirmed by multivariate analyses [hazard ratio (HR) of 2.766; P=0.046] in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup. The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of IBTR were 1.3% and 3.3% (≤47 vs. >47 days, respectively) in the CT+ cohort. For patients in the CT- cohort, a longer delay of initiation of postoperative RT (≤69 vs. >69 days) significantly decreased DFS (HR of 6.430; P=0.002). The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of disease recurrence were 3.0% for RT starting ≤69 days after surgery and 12.6% for RT starting >69 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A high IBTR rate was related to an ICR beyond 47 days. Delay of RT after CT or surgery among patients who undergo BCS should be avoided, especially among patients in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup.

Impact of clinical-pathological factors on locoregional recurrence in mastectomy patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer: who can omit adjuvant radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in T1-T2 tumors with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) is controversial. This study was to identify prognostic factors of locoregional control (LRC) following mastectomy with or without PMRT for patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer and to discuss the selection of patients who might omit PMRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2012, the data of 1474 postmastectomy patients staged pT1-2N1 were analyzed. PMRT was applied in 663 patients. LRC and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model was applied in the univariate and multivariate analyses to recognize the recurrence risk factors. RESULTS: With the median follow-up duration of 93 months (range, 5-168 months), 78 patients (5.3%) failed to secure LRC and 220 patients (14.9%) experienced any recurrence. The 7.7-year LRC and DFS was 94.9% and 85.4% respectively in the entire cohort. PMRT significantly improved 7.7-year LRC from 93.4% to 96.6% (p = 0.005), but not the DFS (p = 0.335). Multivariate analysis revealed that PMRT was an independent prognostic factor of LRC (p < 0.001), meanwhile, age ≤ 40 years (p = 0.012), histological grade 3 (p = 0.004), 2-3 positive nodes (p < 0.001) and tumor size of 3-5 cm (p = 0.045) were significantly associated with decreased LRC. The 7.7-year LRC for patients with 0, 1, and 2-4 risk factors was 97.7% / 98.9% (p = 0.233), 95.3% / 98.0% (p = 0.092), and 80.3% / 94.8% (p < 0.001) in the non-PMRT and PMRT group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer, clinical-pathological factors including young age, histological grade 3, 2-3 positive nodes, and tumor size of 3-5 cm were identified to be predictors of a poorer LRC following mastectomy. Patients with 0-1 risk factor might consider the omission of PMRT.

Characteristics, prognosis, risk factors, and management of recently diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) represents ~1% of all breast cancer cases and is arguably a more aggressive subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Lacking studies with a large population, the survival outcomes of DCISM are still poorly understood and the treatment recommendations remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the long-term outcome of patients with DCISM, potential risk factors for their prognosis, and the difference of survival between patients treated with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (BCT + RT) and mastectomy only. METHODS: In total, 1299 patients from 2008 to 2019 with DCISM were retrospectively retrieved. Clinicopathological features were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was conducted between patients who underwent BCT + RT and mastectomy only. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. Differences of survival between two groups were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Totally, 1286 patients had follow-up information, the median follow-up is 54.57 months, the 5-year local-regional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were 98.6%, 97.1%, and 99.4%, respectively, two deaths were due to breast cancer. Multivariate analysis identified age <40 (p = 0.028) and close margin (≤2 mm) as independent negative prognostic factors for LRFS. No prognostic factors were identified for DMFS and OS. The 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS of patients who had DCIS component ≥5 cm and underwent mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy were 100%, 98.4%, and 98.4%, respectively. After propensity score matching (PSM), no survival difference was observed between patients treated with BCT + RT or mastectomy only. CONCLUSIONS: DCISM patients had a good survival, even those with DCIS component ≥5 cm. Patients aged <40 or with close margin (≤2 mm) had a poorer LRFS, but not DMFS or OS. BCT + RT is a feasible choice for DCISM patients.

Outcomes in Patients with pT3N0M0 Breast Cancer with and without Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The role of adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) remains controversial for patients with pT3N0M0 breast cancer, especially when patients are treated with the updated adjuvant chemotherapy. Our study aimed to compare locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in pT3N0M0 patients with and without postmastectomy radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2000 and 8 September 2016, the database of the Breast Cancer Center of Shanghai yielded 114 patients with node-negative non-metastatic breast cancer larger than 5 cm. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the risk factors for survivals. Differences between the two groups were compared using the Log rank test. RESULTS: Fifty-nine (51.8%) of the patients received adjuvant PMRT. The median follow-up was 62.3 months. Five-year LRFS was 100% in the PMRT group vs 98.1% in the non-PMRT group (P=0.17); 5-year DFS was 97.1% for the entire cohort, 98.0% for the PMRT group vs 96.2% for the non-PMRT group (P=0.18). Univariate analysis identified that family history of malignant tumors, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) molecular subtype were associated with higher locoregional recurrence (LRR) (P<0.05). No PMRT was the only risk factor independently associated with poorer DFS (P=0.048) on multivariate analysis. No difference in BCSS was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated a low LRR rate and good survival for node-negative breast cancer >5 cm. Patients with family history of malignant tumors, TNBC subtype, LVI positivity, or grade 3 disease are at high risk for LRR and might benefit from PMRT.

Postoperative radiotherapy improves overall survival in patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast.

BACKGROUND: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast (PSCCB) is a rare clinical classification of breast tumors. Little is known about its clinicopathological features, prognosis and potential therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the breast. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with PSCCB in our center. All pathological slides were reviewed by an experienced pathologist to confirm the diagnosis. Furthermore, we searched the public database for patients with SCC of the breast. Then, we analyzed the clinicopathological features, treatment methods and patient outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 14 patients with primary SCC of the breast in our center. Additionally, 739 patients with SCC of the breast from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were diagnosed between 1975 and 2016. Only 453 patients who underwent surgery were included in this study. Patients from the SEER database had a more advanced tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage than patients from our center. The median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 104 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.2-120.8 months), and the 5-year OS was 60.8% (95% CI, 56.1%-65.5%). Most of the patients (58%) tested negative for hormonal receptor expression. Multivariate analysis showed that PORT was an independent prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrate that SCC of the breast presents aggressive behavior with unique clinical characteristics. PORT improved OS significantly in patients with SCC of the breast. Longer-term studies are needed to confirm our findings.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: a novel strategy for tumor radiosensitization.

Recently, the focus of enhancing tumor radiosensitivity has shifted from chemotherapeutics to targeted therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are a novel class of selective cell cycle therapeutics that target the cyclin D-CDK4/6 complex and induce G1 phase arrest. These agents have demonstrated favorable effects when used as monotherapy or combined with endocrine therapy and targeted inhibitors, stimulating further explorations of other combination strategies. Multiple preclinical studies have indicated that CDK4/6 inhibitors exhibit a synergistic effect with radiotherapy both in vitro and in vivo. The principal mechanisms of radiosensitization effects include inhibition of DNA damage repair, enhancement of apoptosis, and blockade of cell cycle progression, which provide the rationale for clinical use. CDK4/6 inhibitors also induce cellular senescence and promote anti-tumor immunity, which might represent potential mechanisms for radiosensitization. Several small sample clinical studies have preliminarily indicated that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and radiotherapy exhibited well-tolerated toxicity and promising efficacy. However, most clinical trials in combined therapy remain in the recruitment stage. Further work is required to seek optimal radiotherapy-drug combinations. In this review, we describe the effects and underlying mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitors as a radiosensitizer and discuss previous clinical studies to evaluate the prospects and challenges of this combination.

Adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for early stage breast cancer : Results from a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To report early toxicity and 5­year clinical outcomes of adjuvant breast inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) after breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 467 patients including 406 invasive breast cancer and 61 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were enrolled in a single institutional phase II trial. All patients underwent IMRT-SIB treatment to irradiate the whole breast and the tumor bed. Doses to whole breast and surgical bed were 45 and 60 Gy, respectively, delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The grade of maximum acute skin toxicity during treatment was recorded. Lung toxicity was noted within 6 months and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded at the 12 month follow-up after the end of radiotherapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed during follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 5.46 years. Median age was 46 years old (range 22-70 years old). No patient with DCIS had a local recurrence or distant metastasis. Among 406 patients with invasive breast cancer, the unadjusted 5­year actuarial rate of locoregional control was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.5-100), and distant metastasis-free survival 98.7% (95% CI 97.4-100), respectively. Acute skin toxicity was recorded at grade 0-1 in 76.5% of patients, and grade 2 in 23.5% of patients. None of these patients had grade 3 or more than grade 3 skin toxicity. Grade 1 pneumonitis was found in 25.3% of patients. Assessment of patient reported cosmetic outcomes at the 12 month follow-up showed good or excellent outcome in 86.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inversely planned IMRT-SIB as part of breast-conserving therapy results in optimal 5­year tumor control and minor early toxicities.

Building radiation-resistant model in triple-negative breast cancer to screen radioresistance-related molecular markers.

BACKGROUND: To build the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) radiation resistance model in vitro and vivo, and screen the molecular markers that related to radiation resistance. METHODS: We used X-ray to irradiate MDA-MB-231 cells repeatedly to build radioresistant cell (231-RR), then select one gemcitabine-resistance of MDA-MB-231 cell (231-GEM). We screen differentially expressed genes of these cell lines. Then, we would select 2 genes of them associated with DNA damage repair or cell cycle, and build RNAi lentivirus vector to knock down related gene. We also used X-rays repeatedly exposure TNBC tumor xenograft to build tumor with radioresistance properties, and then verify previously screening differentially expressed genes using IHC. Finally, we used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to validate the relationships between radioresistance related genes and the prognosis of breast cancer. RESULTS: We got 161 up-regulated genes and 156 down-regulated genes from three cell lines. Cellular results show the 231-cell with knock-down CDKN1A or SOD2 gene, its radiation sensitivity was significantly enhanced. We successfully got the TNBC xenograft tumor with radioresistance properties. Immunohistochemical results show that the radioresistance of tumor tissue with higher p21 (CDKN1A encoding protein) and SOD2 expression (P<0.01). The prognosis of patients with low SOD2 expression is better than that of high expression, but have no statistical significance (P=0.119); patients with low CDKN1A expression is significantly better than high expression (P=0.000). Multivariate cox analysis manifest that CDKN1A gene expression level is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer patient (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Construction of radiation resistance cell and xenograft tumor with radio-resistant properties model for radiation biology research is feasible. High SOD2 and CDKN1A is associated with the poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. These two genes could be used as a predicted makers of breast cancer radiation sensitivity.

Biological subtype predicts locoregional recurrence after postmastectomy radiotherapy in Chinese breast cancer patients.

AIM: To investigate the impact of biological subtypes in locoregional recurrence in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: About 583 patients who received postmastectomy radiation between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. According to immunohistochemical staining profile, patients were classified into: Luminal A-like, Luminal B-like, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Local and regional recurrence (LRR) cumulative incidences were calculated by competing risks methodology and the power of prognostic factors was examined by Gray's test and the test of Fine and Gray. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 70.9 months. About 34 LRR events occurred. For Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, and TNBC patients, the 5-year LRR cumulative incidence rates were 1.57%, 4.09%, 10.74%, and 10.28%. Compared with Luminal A, HER2-positive subtype and TNBC had a significant increased risk of LRR (HR was 5.034 and 5.188, respectively). In univariate analysis, predictive factors for higher LRR were HER2-positive subtype (HR = 4.43, P < .05), TNBC (HR = 4.70, P < .05), and pN3 (HR = 5.83, P < .05). In the multivariate model, HER2-positive subtype (HR = 5.034, P < .05), TNBC (HR = 5.188, P < .05), and pN3 (HR = 9.607, P < .01) were independent predictors of LRR. LRR without trastuzumab was similar to that of TNBC (without vs TNBC, 17.88% vs 10.28%, P > .05) in HER2-positive subtype patients, while LRR with trastuzumab was approximate to Luminal A (with vs Luminal A, P > .05). Additionally, endocrine therapy also significantly reduced LRR incidence in the luminal subtype cohort (without vs with therapy, 6.25% vs 2.89%, HR = 0.365, P < .1). CONCLUSIONS: Biological subtype was a prognostic factor of LRR in the PMRT setting among Chinese breast cancer patients.

Internal mammary node irradiation improves 8-year survival in breast cancer patients: results from a retrospective cohort study in real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) improves disease outcome in breast cancer patients, but the contribution of internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in the context of modern systemic treatment is still controversial. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of IMNI in patients with modern systemic treatment in real-world setting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with primary breast cancer treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chestwall/breast irradiation and RNI from 5/2007-12/2010. RNI was delivered to the ipsilateral supraclavicular region and infraclavicular region + / - IMNs. We separated two groups based on the presence and the absence of IMNI. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). DFS and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between two groups were compared with the log-rank test (p < 0.05 considered significant). We used two methods to account for potential confounders: propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 872 patients who received RNI with IMNI (n = 390) or without IMNI (n = 482). Median radiation dose was 50 Gy. Median follow-up was 98 months. IMNI improved 8-year DFS rates versus no IMNI: 75.9% and 64.9% (p < 0.001). After PSM, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. IMNI significantly improved DFS (p < 0.001) in patients after PSM. IMNI was an independent prognostic factor for DFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that IMNI improved DFS and OS in breast cancer patients in the context of modern systemic treatment. These data continue to support that IMNI is a key component of RNI.

The Impact of Radiotherapy on Reoperation Rates in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on reoperation rates in women with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. METHODS: Between June 2001 and December 2015, 832 breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and breast reconstruction with (n = 159) or without (n = 673) PMRT were analyzed retrospectively. Reoperations following breast reconstruction were categorized into the following three types: anticipated, unanticipated, and others. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the impact of PMRT on overall and unanticipated reoperations according to different breast reconstruction types after adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 58.5 months, a total of 1298 operations were performed in 832 breast cancer patients. The rates of overall and unanticipated reoperations were 46.2% and 7.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that PMRT was not associated with overall reoperations in either implant-based reconstruction patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-2.37, p = 0.995) or autologous reconstruction patients (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52-1.40, p = 0.533); however, the impact of PMRT on unanticipated reoperations differed by reconstruction type. In patients who received implant-based reconstructions, PMRT was associated with a 3.05-fold (95% CI 1.20-7.75, p = 0.019) higher odds of unanticipated reoperations, while there was no difference in patients who underwent autologous reconstruction (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.51-2.66, p = 0.713). Delayed reconstruction or delayed-immediate reconstructions were associated with an increased risk of both overall and unanticipated reoperations in both reconstruction cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: PMRT appears to be associated with an increased risk of unanticipated reoperations among patients receiving implant-based reconstruction, but not among those receiving autologous reconstruction. The risk of reoperation should be taken into consideration when selecting the appropriate breast reconstruction type when PMRT is planned.